|
Post by jamie on Dec 6, 2006 20:04:31 GMT 1
Over the last few days I have made a few changes to the forums look. - Default skin removed
- Banner badges embossed
- Snowflake category title bars
- Head and Base images added for news fader and categories
If you have any suggestions, PM me There will also be a few more things added during the next few weeks -Jamie
|
|
|
Post by jonmac on Dec 8, 2006 11:58:55 GMT 1
Could you get the Wellingborough crest on your header please?
|
|
|
Post by jamie on Dec 8, 2006 17:18:38 GMT 1
Could you get the Wellingborough crest on your header please? Added
|
|
|
Post by cookssupporter on Dec 10, 2006 21:16:37 GMT 1
Any chance I can have a copy of the CUFC badge for the cogenhoe website. As you have done a nice job of it
|
|
|
Post by jamie on Dec 10, 2006 22:16:38 GMT 1
Any chance I can have a copy of the CUFC badge for the cogenhoe website. As you have done a nice job of it There we go mate Its a bit crusty round the edge but that only happens when I enlarge it. If you want a smaller one with more sharpness, PM me
|
|
|
Post by jonmac on Dec 11, 2006 14:08:28 GMT 1
Could you get the Wellingborough crest on your header please? Added T H A N K S ;D
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Dec 11, 2006 16:12:02 GMT 1
Where has the Wellingboro website gone? I tried to get on it this morning.
|
|
|
Post by gooba on Jul 19, 2007 14:55:14 GMT 1
Its a bit crusty round the edge but that only happens when I enlarge it. If you want a smaller one with more sharpness, PM me Thats because its a gif and they don't handle photoshops effects very well. Best way to solve it is make sure that you put it on a background, merge all layers, then delete the background. Either that or make it a PNG.
|
|
|
Post by ianh on Jul 19, 2007 17:31:30 GMT 1
that would make it a bit big, ironic really, But I have never found them that Portable
|
|
|
Post by gooba on Jul 19, 2007 17:37:27 GMT 1
Ha. PNGs are the way forward. They're incredibly versatile and can make a site quicker to load rather than using JPGs.
|
|
|
Post by ianh on Jul 19, 2007 18:06:14 GMT 1
find them too large and arent compatible with a lot of stuff. I actually use Fireworks and have done since I started doing websites, but would rather use JPGs than PNGs, in fact I would sooner GIFs or BMPs. Dunno if its just me but I cant get on with them. love Fireworks though
|
|
|
Post by gooba on Jul 19, 2007 18:08:50 GMT 1
Really?
Strange. They do have compatability issues but its only with the useless IE that they have problems with. When it comes to Firefox, they're a dream to use.
|
|
|
Post by ianh on Jul 19, 2007 18:19:42 GMT 1
must admit the only websites I did were on IE, now I only use Firefox (well sometimes IE at work), I mainly manipulate graphics for the programmes now. I'll have to get my webdesign head on and try them out
|
|
|
Post by gooba on Jul 19, 2007 18:22:22 GMT 1
must admit the only websites I did were on IE, now I only use Firefox (well sometimes IE at work), I mainly manipulate graphics for the programmes now. I'll have to get my webdesign head on and try them out Seriously do. If you take a standard site using JPGs, you can cut down the load times by at least 200% if you use pngs. The only thing is, IE hates pngs and shows them with light blue backgrounds so you have to code it with a fix in mind.
|
|
|
Post by gerrard720 on Jul 20, 2007 14:14:35 GMT 1
Ahhh, Gooba - found a new webgeek to get geeky with have you?!?!
|
|