|
|
Post by Stiffed on Aug 14, 2012 19:57:05 GMT 1
I was banned from this forum five years ago for having a go at the Lincs FA, and for some reason I have no way of getting registered again. If reinstated I am not going to say I will not criticise them in future, that will depend on their performance, which I have to admit has improved. Censorship can be justified to some degree where offense is deliberately intended, but I think five years for making public Lincs FA meeting notes is a bit much.
|
|
|
|
Post by kevinb on Aug 14, 2012 21:17:43 GMT 1
Welcome back Stiffler. There have been far more controversial posts on here this past five years. I feel sure that the moderators will now welcome you back with open arms, they did me!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Stiffy that was on Nov 14, 2012 19:12:54 GMT 1
I am still banned despite being told all was OK. I can not use my user name as Stiffy is still registered
|
|
topref
Turned Up For Training
Posts: 9
|
Post by topref on Nov 14, 2012 19:31:48 GMT 1
How on earth can anyone have a go a Lincs Fa ..
They are so ####
|
|
|
|
Post by Gav678 on Nov 15, 2012 8:40:04 GMT 1
It would appear tha the person who has close links with the Lincs Fa is no longer involved in the forum - so ban lifted.
|
|
|
|
Post by ianh on Nov 23, 2012 13:36:40 GMT 1
I was banned from this forum five years ago for having a go at the Lincs FA, and for some reason I have no way of getting registered again. If reinstated I am not going to say I will not criticise them in future, that will depend on their performance, which I have to admit has improved. Censorship can be justified to some degree where offense is deliberately intended, but I think five years for making public Lincs FA meeting notes is a bit much. I dont think theres ever been a lincs fa rep member on here to ban you for publishing minutes, which if online are in the public domain anyway I would question that their performance has improved  |
|
